Etch-A-Sketch 2.0

Or is that redundant? 
Original intent* was Enough Smirking 2.0.
*or 3.0?[Or admiration for nuance]
[Anyway, choice of language was why I was reticent to continue the references to Smirking or Sketches.  I mean when does the Etch-A-Sketch stop?  I guess it is the nature of campaigns, like a Glenn Beck chalk talk.]
[Speaking of sourcing:

“Unless things change and Obama can run on accomplishments, he will have to kill Romney,” said a prominent Democratic strategist aligned with the White House. 

Needless to say this is disgusting and should be disavowed by the campaign.  However the full context just may be important, not that we have it !  Oar have we?] 



**Nature that [!]



[Hint: There is a Mitt of a geometricks re:sourcing. 
Or Platonic Multiplicity. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Vu due the math.]

[Hint 2.0?  The shortest distance between two points is a punchline. Ouch, not my point, but maybe Romney's straightline.  It's geometry, politics and the table.  Is Raw Money hiding behind Little Red Riding Hood?  Or vaccinating attacks strategy?***]

QED ?
*** Foot N. O. T.?
[TBA: PAGES and De-Baits! i.e.(Note to self) Obama v. Romney recent speeches.  JOBS/SCOTUS]
[It's not just me ? (7-6-12) Not Exactly !  The  Para-Gone Seg way ?  More later. ]

March of Times FOOTNOTE 2014 #ONE

3-4-14 : Today / Yesterday 3-3-14 : (?)   Ctrl F (b.s) What, Me Worry? [!]

Note to self:   Rubio/Rice? (...)and the fallacy of the false dilemma? P art !!

3-5-14 :  [a.] Mmmm MOW, MOW, [b.] R.S.V.P., c.Red Bull..., [d.] Tin Foil Herman  [Spoiler Alert.]

3-18-14 [*-1=] A. Notes from Al-Qaeda, b. Para-model, c. ...promote the general..., d. The Billy Club... , e.The Stick and the Carrot? POWER OF WILL? , f. The Other Debates, G. Mess Age Monger, H. I., j. The Tetrahedron Ramble* , k., l. GOP-GAP , m. Debt and Tax Cuts, n. Our Patriotic "Duty" , o. The Straw Bear , p. Borrowed Comment! , q. , r. Tin Foil Herman, S. Geometry , T. Rock, Paper, Scissor?
WTFrac
[*-2=] hecuva D: The Fourth Dimention of Twain / Type-1 Catch-44 [hint: Type-#d=3x4]
[*-3=] A., B. Speculative Physics, C. Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications., d., E., f., G. Kit Ten, H. Heuristic Concurrence and , I. My Respects to Those who Celebrate., J. The Be All and End All?

{Hint: Not to pun on the math nor vu due, but there are at least two type-ohs.}

MSM Bungler Alert

In-"F"able Fallout?

Vu due the meth. 
Parlay vous Fudge eh ?
Chaize Knee ?

Jimmy Buffet ?

OK, I could not find the flippin' table image, and the fact that these appointments are embarrassing is not to be denied, but in reality it is like the half pipe or thin ice(or thick slush) of scoring?  Do they take the best or ski cross figures?  i.e.  As I have calculated there are 115 career and 58 political ambassadors holding office.  Which includes 36 career versus 40 political in the second term.  That seems to mean that 79 "careers" and 18 "politicals" were at their posts in the first heat/term. 

ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]

[7-19-12 Anachronistic Caution * ! ](*)
page i
[ACTUAL POST DATE 7-5-12]


(i) want to back this up.
Pardon the pun on Her-man, not to mention His-story.

QED? (not exactly)
A: Etch-A-Sketch 2.0
B: bs-Cain
C: bs-Cain+flop
D: bs-Romney
E: bs-her+story
(A throuh E are the scroll overs for this post.)

Back-up for 1,2,3
i.e. footnotes from QED up. 
(From Etch-a-Sketch 2.0, I wish to back-up the links from the bottom up.)
I. "Strategy" bs Rosen ( a, b, c, d )
II. "attacks" bs vaccine ( a, b )
III. "vaccinating" Contempt for Courage

IV: "behind" bs zipper ( a, b )

V: "math" bs S.E. ( a, b, c, d , e, f, *)
VI: "due" bs Kant+Hegel ( a **   )
VII: "vu" bs die+manics ( a, b, )

* will not include search find for this post
[by George it works: a - f = 6 ***]
** does not include embedded bs (blog searches)
*** provided the al gore rythms hold
[Not to further parse the links but so far it holds 4gore = a - l]
(*) asterisk * updated

Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**

Not to spike the ball. 
Mandate will become a tax!

Well... that was my idea or interpretation of the bill, but that was FOX News' claim.
But my original ball that might have been a spike was "Democrats Upheld" but Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a bi-partisan bill, so I cannot claim a victory for Democrats.  It is a victory for congress and the political progress.  It is a victory for Obama and bi-partisanship.  Not that victory is a Burger King*, or having it my way.  I should admit that recently I thought that part of the ruling would be kicking the can down the road, since some of the provisions don't go into effect till 2014. 
Oops, in plain English, I may have been right about the can.
Senator Dan Coates on Jansing&Co. claimed lack of bi-partisanship.  That claim is a victory for politics and bi-partisanship.  The ACA was passed under reconciliation.  It was not a Democratic bill, but a democratic bill.  If the President can be blamed(see choice/bold-underlined) for congress not getting things done, when the Republicans obstruct with filibusters.  Republicans cannot have all the changes they could get and not take credit for them by voting against the bill to claim partisanship by not being able to filibuster. 
If anything this is a vaccine to the insanity of the partisan Issa Committee which doctor for the NRA. 
Pump it up! Obama Cares !  Chris Matthews has a very interesting Stupid Conspiracy.  On the other hand, I thought that the obvious was missing in the court arguments.  I think that means that it was plain that a loss of tax break is not a penalty, or is it the semantics of taxes.

* whose weigh or beef?
** still looking for the bullet ratio aka up 'n over or held/turned [People/$]
[of and for the people, over money]
[The real in'f-fable might be taxes/commerce. The High Five ?  4GETIT?
It is a win for Politics, Bi-Partisanship, Obama, and the Economy!  But according to Raw Money?  "A Choice"... between Government standing between you and big corporations or big corporations standing between you and your health care.(Bold over underlined ? )]
Not to strike a punchline, but bottomline:  Obama is Bush! A Political Capitalist!
Romney is Kerry!  A nuanced flip-flopper.  But only in the light of...(the president speaks)***

(asterisked anachronism888baneORspeaks.)

***  TBA
[Coff E T A B L E ]
[AM H&H game change? Tweet Morning Joe! ET? MR doc RM RL btw: NFIB v. SSHH$ ]
[PC v MF ! (?)]

(photo credit)

[Hi5-4th'tableCongressISjobWON!]
[Congress is open to a peel!]

[I don't have the rest of the story to back this up, but I think that Norman Goldman analyzes NFIB v. SSHHS the way I have.  Not only that but Justice Thomas or the D$ent may have bust the fallacy that health care is commerce.  Not only that but I think that Justice Roberts figured out how it can work or not work depending on congress, as I think that congress could have if they had more cooperation rather than partisanship.  NorMan really cut through it with a caller, regarding small business and Mitt RobbedMe.  How do you know when Mitt is telling a lie?  He is either talking about Obama or economics, if not both at the same time. Just between me and we, it seems that without fully reading the Affordable Care Act or the full decision, the Supreme Court seems to have understood it better than it was argued, but not much more than I thought it was.  The catch is that we are patching together various interpretations that make a decision that still takes some tweaking by congress.  It puts taxes and states at the table.  The catch seems to hinge on the powers of congress and the definition of commerce.  As Chris Matthews was want to call it a Stupid Conspiracy, I may lean toward calling it a Swift Strategy, despite the games some play with acronyms, initialism or caricatures.]
NG
GN
UP v UC
Unprecedent President vis a vis Unprecedented Congress.
Now that is PC! Due(or vu doo) the Math!
(Bush/Obama x Obstructive/Health Care)
[I would like to thank three people for helping me understand GeOhMeTry[!] Randi Rhodes, Lawrence O'Donnel and Michael [links 6-29] Moore... Well...there are host of others but in particular RR and LO, have brilliant insight if not intel.  Randi a quick take on Obama, Lawrence an understanding of the political process, and MM a way with the message and the medium.  MR-RM.
Plausible Deniability/Plausible Incompetence/ Deniable Competence. That is the voodoo some do.
[Upheld -  U p h e l d !]